Friday, September 26, 2014

That Was The Week That Was - Issue 29

A look back at the week's health policy news with a focus on ACA implementation

Before we get to this week's developments, here is a review of  9 mind-blowing facts about the dysfunction of the American health-care system. Stark reminders of what we're trying to fix!

In other developments a look at good implementation results (Hispanic coverage gains) and areas for concern (tax forms and security questions). Also court developments, marketplace developments, lots on end of life care, and wrapping up (or in this case rapping) with the funny video of the week.

ACA: Polls/Opposition
The ACA has many moving parts, I try and discuss both what is and isn't working each week. But some coverage doesn't even try: " It's easy to give people a skewed impression of Obamacare without ever running a false story. The Affordable Care Act is a huge law, and at any given moment, there are some good things happening in it and some bad things happening in it. If you run multiple articles every day on the problems and nothing on the broader trends, it's easy to mislead your audience." (In conservative media, Obamacare is a disaster. In the real world, it’s working.)

By focusing on the negatives, the GOP finds ObamaCare opening. Focusing on GAO reports of problems (including the security issue discussed below).

Back on the positive side, a Commonwealth Fund survey highlights another success, showing that Latinos Get Insured by Obamacare in Large Numbers. (Catching Up: Latino Health Coverage Gains and Challenges Under the Affordable Care Act Primary Source.)

ACA: Court Cases
This week a federal appeals court tossed a suit regarding the delays in the employer mandate (Court tosses Obamacare mandate lawsuit brought by doctors). Of note is that this is the same argument being brought in the House of Representative's suit of the President. Is this a foreshadowing of how that case will be resolved? Only time will tell.

Meanwhile, Hobby Lobby is the case that keeps on giving as House Republicans fuming over 'regurgitated' birth control mandate stating that the revised rules introduced to address the Court's decision flies in the face of that decision. Also, Dad pleads: Don't let health insurance offer my daughters birth control! He wants to not have his insurance plan cover contraceptive care lest his daughters access the benefit without his approval.

ACA: Premiums
The New York Times takes a look at the premium hikes this year - both in a historical context and in light of what individuals can accomplish by switching plans: In Context, Health Premium Increases Don’t Actually Look Like Increases.

ACA: Marketplaces
The administration this week discussed that HealthCare.gov Is Given an Overhaul while at the same time cautioning Don't expect 'perfection' on health care site. It seems like public expectations are lining up with the reality as Voters, Administration Don’t Expect Perfection on Exchanges.

Meanwhile,  HHS announced that the marketplace would have 25% more insurers (New Report: Health Insurance Marketplace will have 25 percent more issuers in 2015 Primary Source). One of my favorite reactions to this news was from the Washington Post: "So c’mon, conservatives — look to your free market principles, and give Obamacare at least a little credit." (Some good news about Obamacare that even conservatives should love)  Here in Maine these statistics are reflected by the fact that Harvard Pilgrim joins Anthem, Maine Community Health Options in state's ACA exchange (and don't forget to read the sidebar on the left side of the page).

A mixed message from a report looking at marketplace security: Government Hackers Try To Crack Healthcare.Gov "The government's own watchdogs tried to hack into HealthCare.gov earlier this year and found what they termed a critical vulnerability - but also came away with respect for some of the health insurance site's security features."

And a disturbing study regarding not so much the amount spent (although that's not great either), but the lack of controls and reporting regarding what is being spent: Obamacare Website Costs Exceed $2 Billion, Study Finds.

Two different looks at narrow networks - the practice as opposed to the theory - show positive results. First, from Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute (hardly a mouthpiece for the insurance industry) the finding that Narrow networks draw few complaints from consumers: study. Additionally, a look a "natural experiment" in Massachusetts also showed positive results: Physician Choice in Exchange Plans -"Overall, spending on health care fell by about 35 percent. Most importantly, this fall in spending was not uniform: we saw an increase in spending on, and utilization of, physician primary care, with large falls in spending on specialists, hospital inpatient and outpatient visits, and emergency room use."

On the other hand, Consumer Group Sues 2 More Calif. Plans Over Narrow Networks. Backlash or no backlash, some days it's hard to tell. Putting the pieces together tells me that narrow networks can be a viable option - when introduced to consumers appropriately and with sufficient education.

Those who work with marketplace enrollees know this, but it's worth repeating. There is a danger when low-income enrollees select the bronze plan instead of the silver plan. While the premiums may initially appear lower, doing so for those earning less than 250% of the Federal Poverty Level means they forgo extensive additional help with their cost sharing. In addition to impacting the individual, these Underinsured ACA enrollees strain community health centers.

ACA: Employers
The Kaiser Family Foundation takes an in-depth look at Private Exchanges. Remember, enrollees on these exchanges ARE NOT eligible for individual subsidies. Instead, they may face higher costs if their employers go this route since it may go hand in hand with a switch to a defined contribution model of health benefits (as opposed to a defined benefit model): Examining Private Exchanges in the Employer-Sponsored Insurance Market.

Elsewhere on the employer front, in a surprise even to me, the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago found that Obamacare’s small business exchanges offer cheaper health coverage. Due to the lack of functionality during the first year of the SHOP's existence, there have been questions as to its utility. This study shows that even with those functional limitations it's worth checking out the SHOP plan premium rates.

In a follow-up to last week's story, the Debate Grows Over Employer Plans With No Hospital Benefits. What to many of us seems like a clear error in the spreadsheet, to some it seems like an intentional decision on the part of CMS. As the article states, we're still waiting from clarification from CMS on what's really going on.

ACA: Other
In multiple public appearances this week, the new Secretary of HHS Burwell Touts Obamacare Gains Heading to Next Enrollment while at the same time stating that White House reassessing Obamacare enrollment goal for 2015.

We know that sometimes mistakes are made. It's nice to see that when that happens, there are times when they actually get fixed as CVS cuts checks after charging women birth control co-pay.

Also this week, Tim Jost took a look at the new tax forms that individuals receiving subsidies as well as those receiving mandate exemptions will need to complete: Implementing Health Reform: Complicated ACA Tax Forms Could Cause Problems. The short version is they are not pretty. The forms are complicated, and in the case of those receiving subsidies require those who previously were able to use the 1040 EZ to now file a more complex form. This topic was also discussed at this week's Exchange Advisory Committee Meeting.

Costs
Did you know you can be billed by a doctor you never met and never asked for?  Unfortunately this has always been the case - but it seems that the practice may be getting worse. The NY Times looks at one man's experience and the underlying trend: After Surgery, Surprise $117,000 Medical Bill From Doctor He Didn’t Know.

As a follow-up to last week's story about the first closure of a proton-beam center, a report detailing that Insurers Hesitant To Cover Many Proton Beam Therapy Treatments.

One of the standard arguments of opponents of the ACA is that you can't truly address the cost problem without "tort reform", changes to liability for malpractice cases. However, a New study shows that the savings from 'tort reform' are mythical.

ACOs (accountable care organizations) continue to make the news. You can find a review of what they are here: FAQ On ACOs: Accountable Care Organizations, Explained. Sometimes they work: A Health Care Success Story, sometimes it's more cloudy: Medicare gives first glimpse of ACO quality performance, sometimes they don't work: Medicare's Pioneer program down to 19 ACOs after three more exit and finally, sometimes they struggle to do what they set out to do (so we don't know if they would work or not): ACOs struggle with advanced IT, interoperability, survey shows.

At the risk of repeating myself, I note that even as some ACOs leave the Pioneer program, some of them (and others) others are joining a different Medicare ACO program (the Shared Savings program). This is all still very much a work in progress. While we'd like a clear answer on what works and what doesn't, it's only be trying these different programs that we're going to get to the point where we know those answers.

Medicaid
A report from HHS showing the Impact Of Insurance Expansion On Hospital Uncompensated Care Costs In 2014 (Primary Source). Basically the report shows that Affordable Care Act Reduces Costs for Hospitals, mostly by expanding Medicaid (Hospitals In States That Won't Expand Medicaid Left With More Unpaid Bills). In light of this, and all the other evidence showing the financial impact of Medicaid expansion, it's not surprising that Money talks: Obamacare initiative makes headway in Republican states.

When some states have expanded Medicaid, they've introduced the concept enrollees paying premiums. Unfortunately, we now know that premiums can be an obstacle to enrollment. Add to that the fact that sometimes the amount collected does not even cover the administrative expenses of collecting the premiums makes it clear that often the concept is being used to discourage participation more than anything else: Medicaid Gives the Poor a Reason to Say No Thanks.

Medicare
As we near open-enrollment on the marketplace, we also approach open-enrollment for Medicare and Medicare Part D (prescription drugs). With that in mind, HHS Warns About Medicare Part D Coupons - this practice is illegal because it provides perverse incentives for individuals to pick what ends up being a more expensive drug. But the practice still goes on.

On a related note, there will be Fewer Medicare Rx plans offered for 2015 "Christine Harhaj, a senior manager at Avalere, said the consolidations likely reflect pressure from the CMS to eliminate products that don't offer meaningful differences in benefit design and make choices simpler for seniors. “A lot of times the choices can be overwhelming,” Harhaj said."

Finally, on the Medicare front, note that there is discussion of ACOs, including Medicare ACOs, in the Cost section above.

Drugs
Every time a rule is passed, those impacted by that rule seem to work to undermine it. In the continuing battle for increasing the appropriate use of generic drugs, Legislation Would Prevent Drug Makers From Thwarting Generic Rivals has been introduced.

Under the category of hard to figure out the right balance, DEA: Vicodin, Some Other Pain Meds Will Be Harder to Get - on the one hand we want to keep these out of the hands of abusers while on the other hand we don't want to keep them out of the hands of those who truly need the relief.

System Transformation
After the release of the Institute of Medicine's report last week, more focus on end of life care. We'll start off with a disturbing look at how the system failed this family in a big way. Note that "The records she obtained showed that in the last year of his life, his care cost at least a million dollars." It was not for lack of resources, it was for lack of the ability to use those resources appropriately: A Father’s Last Wish, and a Daughter’s Anguish - Fighting Health Care System for Simple Request: To Die at Home

Next a look at how one doctor was able to handle things the way the family wanted, this is how it should work: Cost-benefit analysis: A case where conservative management wins.

Care at the end of life can bring up difficult questions, such as: Deactivating a pacemaker: Is it euthanasia?

And here Kaiser looks at why the system is currently biased against doing the right thing: Too Many People Die In Hospital Instead Of Home. Here’s Why.

And finally, speaking of doing the right thing, Congress approves tighter scrutiny of hospices.

On the vaccination front, strange bedfellows indeed as you find me agreeing with an opinion piece appearing in the Wall Street Journal: The Anti-Vaccination Epidemic - Whooping cough, mumps and measles are making an alarming comeback, thanks to seriously misguided parents.

Several other items this week I found interesting:
  • The mystery of the falling teen birth rate - linked to an earlier version, has been considerably updated
  • What your education says about your health " "Health care reform must be accompanied by changes in social and economic policies that are a 'win-win': creating economic opportunity for families while also saving lives (and costs) from medical illnesses," they write."
  • Why climate change is a growing health threat " The effects are different across the country, the op-ed notes. Maine, for instance, had seen a tenfold increase in Lyme disease cases over the previous decade, while the Florida Keys has reported cases of a tropical disease rarely seen in the United States."

And finally, in our comic video of the week, a graphic reminder not to use antibiotics when they're not needed: DAWN OF THE DIFF (C. DIFFICILE RAP ANTHEM).

All comments and suggestions are welcome; please let me know what you think. And as always, thanks for reading!

Funded by support from the Maine Health Access Foundation
*The title is a tribute to the BBC show, the NBC show and the amazing Tom Lehrer album "That Was The Year That Was"

Saturday, September 20, 2014

That Was The Week That Was - Issue 28

A look back at the week's health policy news with a focus on ACA implementation

This week lots of different measures of the uninsured, a look at enrollment numbers, (another) reminder of how tough the next open-enrollment period will be, more cost info (both good and bad), an Institute of Medicine report on end-of-life care, and more.   (You'll note I've made the section heads larger - at the request of a reader the idea is to allow people to better skim to their areas of interest, let me know what you think.)

ACA: Polls/Opposition
The week started off with three sets of numbers being released regarding the number of uninsured in the US:

The Census Bureau released two sets of numbers, both for 2013. The Current Population Survey (CPS) is the "gold standard" for these numbers, but due to a change in methodology in 2013 it only shows numbers for the year with no comparisons (the idea was to create the new baseline before the major impacts of the ACA took place including being before the first open-enrollment period). The American Community Survey (ACS) is a smaller survey that also provides numbers regarding health coverage.  Methodology was not changed, so numbers were released on a state level showing the difference between 2012 and 2013. (Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2013 (Primary Source))

Additionally, the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics released its first-quarter health insurance survey for 2014.  Again no change in methodology so changes year to year were given. (Health Insurance Coverage: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, January–March 2014 (Primary Source))

If that wasn't going to be confusing enough, here in Maine, the 2013 data, bucking the national trend, showed a decrease in the number of uninsured between 2012 and 2013 (not, 2014).  Maine along with New Jersey were the only two states to show such a decrease (Number of Mainers without health insurance rose 9 percent in 2013).  Note that the margin of error was almost as large as the decrease, so we don't want to over interpret the finding.  However, a review of the demographics showing where the decline took place did show that it may have been caused by the reduction in Medicaid eligibility that went into effect here last year (Data on uninsured doesn’t explain Maine’s increase - But two analysts say increases in certain demographic groups suggest that shrinking state Medicaid rolls is a likely reason.).

Here in Maine, as in many states across the country, the tale of implementation is truly a tale of two cities.  Those eligible for marketplace subsidies and/or living in states that have expanded Medicaid have benefited, while those who would have been eligible for the expansion but are living in states that haven't expanded are left out. 

For 2014 the national numbers showed a drop in the number of uninsured (Number of Americans Without Health Insurance Falls, Survey Shows).  However, these numbers only represent the first quarter of 2014, so the late surge representing about half of the enrollment is not included (New Estimates on Health Coverage Are Accurate but Outdated).  To my mind, the most robust numbers we have so far are still the Gallup numbers released earlier.

Also this week, HHS released a "snapshot" of the amount of people covered (and paid!) as of August, and it was a good number:  7.3 Million People Have Obamacare Coverage  "But the updated enrollment figures still beat the Congressional Budget Office's expectations. CBO estimated that the exchanges would cover about 6 million people this year, after accounting for churn."

In addition to beating the CBO forecast, it also put a lie to the cooking the books theory that emerged when the eight million number was announced in March: Obamacare Critics Said Obama Was 'Cooking the Books.' New Data Shows He Wasn't.  When the eight million was released, everyone knew that the full number would not end up enrolled.  Estimates ranged from 80% and lower to 90% - one way to interpret the 7.3 number is that it represents 90% of the original number, so 90% paid.  The churn that inevitably occurred netted out even - those who signed up during special enrollment periods (due to life changes, etc) balanced out those who dropped off (due to reasons like newly available employer coverage, etc.). 

So how are all those enrollees doing?  A Commonwealth Fund survey finds that Majority happy with ObamaCare plans.

Meanwhile, we continue to see that the connection of health reform to the President hurts it's popularity.  In one example: Survey: Republicans Like Obamacare a Lot More if You Call It by a Different Name and in another: Health Law Falls Flat With Kentucky Voters, Even Those It Helps.


ACA: Premiums
As we reported last week, the Maine Bureau of Insurance has released the final marketplace rates for the next enrollment period, as we saw Premiums for Obamacare plans in Maine dip or remain flat for 2015.  Nationally, we can see the situation through a Commonwealth Fund survey: Are Americans Finding Affordable Coverage in the Health Insurance Marketplaces? Results from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey.

ACA: Marketplaces
Looking towards the next open enrollment, as more and more details of the process come out, we find more cause for concern (Hurdles for Obama health law in 2nd sign-up season).  With the new process, if someone does what they should and go in to update their financial information, "...If they like their current coverage, they can renew it by entering the 14-digit identification number for their health plan. Or they can search for the plan in the online catalog of private insurance options known as Plan Compare."   (Health Law Has Caveat on Renewal of Coverage). Not exactly user friendly.


There's been more discussion this week regarding healthcar.gov's security as a result of Probe: HealthCare.gov website must boost security.  While this is almost certainly true, I would humbly point out that the same can probably be said about any website.  To date, there have been no breaches of any confidential information on the site.

ACA: Employers
One of the innovations in the law for small employees is the introduction of employee choice to the small group market.  While we won't be getting it here in Maine until next year (2016 plan year), if you'd like to understand more about the topic Health Affairs put out a Policy Brief on the topic: Employee Choice , a long read but it does an excellent job explaining the issue.

ACA: Other
While no major developments on the Hobby Lobby front, Vox takes a look and sees that After Obamacare, two-thirds of insured women now get their birth control pills free.  Although there is a new concern as Rise Of Catholic Insurance Plans Raises Questions About Contraceptive Coverage.  And finally on the birth control front, Planned Parenthood is testing a new way to provide services: Birth control a few clicks away: But will app discourage exams?

Kaiser took a look at how the Health Law Tempers New State Coverage Mandates.  Remember the law says that if states pass new mandates, the state has to pay for them, this report looks at the issue overall and ways states are trying to get around that provision of the law.

Costs
A new Health Affairs paper reports that $1.43 of every $100 in America goes toward hospital administration. As Sarah Kliff puts it in her report: "This reflects something particular about the American health care system — namely, it's a complex mess."

In addition to spending on administration, we spend a lot on technology - some of it unnecessary.  As a proton therapy center closes, some see it as a sign I see it as cause for celebration!  " “I look at this closure as a sign that insurers are finally empowered to say this is a dubious medical technology” in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer, said Amitabh Chandra, director of health policy research at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. “The 'build it and they will come' philosophy around these centers is being questioned.”"

Thinking about proton beam therapy begs the question, How much money do we waste on useless health care?  The article looks at the measures of waste from the Dartmouth Health Atlas and questions around its methodology.

CMS announced this week that New Affordable Care Act tools and payment models deliver $372 million in savings, improve care.  Here's additional coverage: Medicare ACOs improve quality, have mixed results on slowing spending, CMS says - while the story has a bit of a negative spin, it still contains lots of interesting information.  To those who say only some of the ACOs are working, I say that's why it's a pilot!  We may not yet have the perfect formula, but it seems clear the theory is sound.

As part of the changing landscape, we've seen a rush of hospital mergers.  This makes the FTC and Insurance companies (and me) nervous:  F.T.C. Wary of Mergers by Hospitals " “Hospitals that face less competition charge substantially higher prices,” said Martin S. Gaynor, director of the F.T.C.’s bureau of economics, adding that the price increases could be “as high as 40 percent to 50 percent.”" and Insurers Fight Hospital Mergers As ACA Snubs Fee For Service Medicine.

At the same time, you have Anthem (an insurance company) entering into a new partnership with hospitals.  Business Week observes The Vanishing Difference Between Hospitals and Insurance Companies and a local account of how the New Anthem Blue Cross plan takes on Kaiser.

Also on the cost control front, a report that One Way to Control Health Costs: Health Savings Accounts.  As we've observed before, the problem with these plans (and results) is they don't differentiate between preventing unneeded care and preventing needed care - they end up doing both.  So I ask, are they controlling costs by limiting access?

And finally, a cautionary note - yes, nationally we now have guaranteed issue and no pre-existing condition exclusions, but where there's a will there's a way, here is a look at How Insurers Are Finding Ways to Shift Costs to the Sick.

Medicaid
Funding for CHIP is set to run out in September of 2015.  The Fate of Children’s Insurance Program Is Called Into Question at Senate Hearing.  We'll be talking more about this as the year progresses, for now if you'd like more background on the topic: FAQ: Children’s Health Insurance Program’s Future Is Unclear Under The Health Law


And a Medicaid specific reminder that if you want a program to be popular, don't connect it to the President: The Three Words That Shift Views On Medicaid.

A series of focus groups across the country took a look at what new Medicaid enrollees think of the program: Millions have joined Medicaid under Obamacare. Here’s what they think of it.  While most are pleased, the results highlight some continuing access issues.

On a state specific front, bad news in Virginia as Va. legislators approve budget deal, reject Medicaid expansion.  But good news as in five states, including Maine, Elections poised to expand ObamaCare with the possible election of Democratic governors.

Medicare
CMS announced Medicare Advantage rates for 2015: Press release: Medicare Advantage enrollment at all-time high; premiums remain affordable (Primary Source) and at the same time U.S. says Medicare Advantage enrollment at all-time high.  This in spite of the provisions of the ACA that work to reduce payments to Medicare Advantage plans.  Yet another example of the doomsayers getting it wrong.

Drugs
In a positive, if long overdue move, a new initiative announced by the White House  Aims to Curb Peril of Antibiotic Resistance.  While some criticize the plan for not going far enough (especially with respect to the use of antibiotics in food production), it puts focus on the problem and starts to address it.  Which is further along than we were before the initiative was announced.

And the good news keeps on coming as the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care exceeds goal to reduce use of antipsychotic medications in nursing homes.  These drugs have for too long been used inappropriately, now the usage statistics are moving in the right direction.

And yet one more positive development (before we get back to the usual state of things) as the F.D.A. Panel Backs Limits on Testosterone Drugs.  For those not familiar with the issue, "low T" or low testosterone, it is a made-up condition promoted by manufacturers of testosterone to boost sales. Now some focus is being put on these inappropriate practices.

Lots to report in this week's Sovaldi update.  First, it seems that in preparation for a new version of the treatment coming out soon, The new $84,000 hepatitis C treatment is losing momentum, for now.  But if you thought Sovaldi treatment cost was already high, just wait as Gilead to raise price for new hepatitis C drug above $84,000.  Although the Maker of Hepatitis C Drug Strikes Deal on Generics for Poor Countries the conditions of the deal insure that the lower cost versions will not be available here.

One alternative to dialysis centers is (for some) the option of in-home dialysis treatment.  For suitable patients, it has many advantages of going to a center several times a week to be hooked up to a machine.  Unfortunately, Shortage of in-home dialysis solution has patients worried and is limiting new patients from trying the treatment.

System Transformation
Regular readers know that I find it appalling the way we handle end-of-life care in this country.  I'm not the only one as the Institute of Medicine released a 500 page report this week looking at end of life care, making very specific recommendations (Panel Urges Overhauling Health Care at End of Life).  The conversation, and changes are long overdue.  The ACA tried to move this issue forward, but thanks to the death panel myth was unable to do so.  It’s time to bury the ‘death panel’ myth for good. Is this the way to do it?

In the context of this new report, Vox has a great interview with Ezekiel Emanuel, head of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Pennsylvania University: Doctors wanted to extend life. Instead they extended death.

On the vaccination front, an appalling statistic as Wealthy L.A. Schools' Vaccination Rates Are as Low as South Sudan's.  There is just no excuse for this clear disregard of science.  And speaking of no excuse, there is none for the comments and damage done by, and selfishness reflected in, the work of Bob Sears: Bob Sears: Public health isn’t something his parents need to think about  " His white, affluent, Orange County kids can’t be bothered with needles. Sure, it’s no good for public health, but public health isn’t something his parents need to think about."

Several items to report on EHRs, or Digital Records, or whatever the kids are calling electronic medical records these days.  First, Frustrated AMA Calls For ‘Action Plan’ On Digital Records.  There is no doubt that the state of the technology leaves much to be desired.  Here is one doctors perspective on 5 things EMRs should learn from social media.

But there is so much promise, if we can just figure out how to do it right.  One step forward as Cerner and Athenahealth say integrating with Apple's mobile health service (they are two of the three largest EHR companies).  

Extending our look at digital information, we know a very small percentage of us account for the majority of dollars spent on health care.  While the work with Apple has potential to be helpful, Drew Altman reminds us that we need the technology folks to focus on the chronically ill (Needed: Apps That Focus on High-Need, High-Cost Patients).

A few more items of note this week:

And finally, since I just spent a week on Prince Edward Island (that's why I'm a day late publishing), it seems I should say something about the Canadian health care system.  But since I was more focused on celebrating my 25th anniversary and eating fish & chips, I'll leave it to Dr. Phil Caper to do it for me:  The troubling way we pay hospitals in Maine and throughout the US.

Thanks for reading!

All comments and suggestions are welcome; please let me know what you think.  And as always, thanks for reading!

Funded by support from the Maine Health Access Foundation
*The title is a tribute to the BBC show, the NBC show and the amazing Tom Lehrer album "That Was The Year That Was"

Friday, September 12, 2014

That Was The Week That Was - Issue 27

A look back at the week's health policy news with a focus on ACA implementation

You want polls?  We've got lots of polls!  We've also got a cool use of the word shenanigans, a calculator for Maine's 2015 marketplace rates, lots on the coming open-enrollment period, a large employer-health care survey, two global health comparison reports and since I like you, a comic medical video of the week.

ACA: Polls/Opposition
The stars were aligned this week so we saw three ongoing measures of public perceptions of the ACA released at the same time. The Kaiser Tracking Poll (Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: August-September 2014), the Wall Street Journal/NBC News Poll (Americans Still Not Sold on Obamacare – WSJ/NBC Poll) and the Washington Post/ABC News Poll (Even in Romney states, more want to keep Obamacare than repeal it). If you were to write a single headline for all three polls, it would be "dog bites man" or to put it another way, nothing really new.

If there was a surprise it came from the Kaiser poll which showed that the ACA was only the dominant issue for 3% of registered voters going into this year's election.

This article put it well: Politically, Obamacare Isn't About Health Care - Partisanship, not personal experience, seems to guide public approval of the law.  As much as we've seen the laws successes over the past 6 months, the needle on public opinion just has not moved. It's clear that when people react to "Obamacare" they are talking about their feelings about the President, not about a complex health care reform law whose provisions the majority of people support.

This op-ed in the NY Times put it well: Stop the Anti-Obamacare Shenanigans, plus there is the added bonus of the use of one of my favorite words shenanigans :)

Another poll out this week Poll: Medicaid Expansion -  Does have some interesting news, confirming what we've seen here in Maine,  nationally "...62% of all voters in states that have not expanded Medicaid believe all states should expand the program as provided under the ACA."

Meanwhile, the old hits keep on playing with the House returns to anti-Obamacare votes and An ‘Obamacare’ attack ad stuck in a time warp. Maybe next week I'll just copy a column from six months ago where I reported on the same things...

ACA: Premiums
A good summary piece from our friends at Wonkblog looking at premium news: Some good news — and some concerning news — for health insurance premiums.

As you recall from last week, the numbers in Maine are looking good!  Maine's BoI has now released a handy calculator for the new rates: Maine Bureau of Insurance 2014 Rate Calculator now available (Go to their main page and look for "NEW! 2015 Rate Calculator Now Available" to download the spreadsheet. Note that macros need to be enabled in Excel.)  These rates are now "almost final" having been reviewed by BoI and in some instances changed as a result of the review. They have been sent to CMS who will also do a review, but absent some unforeseen circumstance, given the work already done by BoI CMS should accept them as is.

ACA: Marketplaces
The ramp-up to the next open-enrollment period is gaining steam. First up we have the new navigator grants being announced:  HHS announces $60 million to help consumers navigate their health care coverage options in the Health Insurance Marketplace. Last year's grants were just for one year. Here in Maine the awards went to the same two groups as last year - taking advantage of the experience and the benefits of continuity. Of course here in Maine in addition to the Federal grant recipients we also have a broad range of community groups receiving support from MeHAF to do this important work.

And speaking of open-enrollment, this blog post is a good overview, complete with cautions, about the renewal process:  Do Nothing to Renew or Get an Updated Eligibility Determination? CMS Puts out Final Marketplace Renewal Rules. Remember, there are New challenges for O-Care’s second year, so buckle up, it may be a bumpy ride!

Another bumpy ride is testifying before Congress... HHS and IRS officials got to do just that this week, unfortunately the sound bites were not always clear. We had an HHS Official: Healthcare.gov Updates Will Be 'Improvement But Not Perfection'. While it's good to set realistic expectations they might have been better served by stopping before the "not perfection" part. Meanwhile, the quote from the IRS chief: 'Whenever we can, we follow the law' prompted the inevitable question, why don't you follow the law all the time... In both instances, their words were fair in the full context of the remarks but the full context is not what the media always focuses on.

And speaking of focus, the Health Chief Seeks to Focus on Insurance Site. Her comments also talked about moving beyond politics...  I'll let you use your imagination to gauge how likely that is.

Also looking towards November (open-enrollment, not the elections), the insurance industry is still nervous: Reform Update: Insurers brace for potential IT problems in second open enrollment. Some seem to be particularly concerned about the reenrollment process - what happens behind the scenes when and individual chooses a new plan instead of accepting the reenrollment.

ACA: Employers
A major employer survey was released this week from Kaiser (2014 Employer Health Benefits Survey (Primary Source)). While overall the results were positive (Obamacare Hasn’t Driven Up Employers' Health Care Premiums), on a practical basis, Yes, you are paying a lot more for your employer health plan than you used to.

While the historic cost increases have moderated recently, results of this survey show that the trend of employers putting more of the burden on employees continues. One of the basic flaws of our reliance on employer-sponsored health plans is that Health insurance premiums are eating American workers' raises. Take special note of the second chart in that link which looks at workers contribution increases, premium increases, wage increases and inflation. It's not pretty...

The survey also showed that another of the horror story predictions by the laws opponents has not come to pass as Workplace insurance coverage levels steady in year one of Obamacare.

Also on the employer front, reports that there is a Flaw In Federal Software Lets Employers Offer Plans Without Hospital Benefits, Consultants Say. Hopefully the spotlight put on this by the media will result in a quick correction to the software.

When discussing healthcare, I often talk about the move to evidence based care - that is doing things that have been proven to work. What is true for health care is also true for health policy (and policy in general). We should be doing what we know works. Unfortunately, as we've seen time and again with health care, that's not always the case.As wellness programs continue to grow, and Businesses are testing employees’ body fat and paying them to lose weight, the evidence says that often these programs just don't work. "One example is that they’re very fond of workplace wellness programs. This is surprising, because while such programs sound great, research shows they rarely work as advertised." (Do Workplace Wellness Programs Work? Usually Not)

ACA: Other
Brookings released a complex economic analysis this week looking at how each state's residents did under the ACA. The study, which looked at 48 of the 50 states, found Maine enrollees did the best. " Looking at the states individually, she finds that the law benefitted enrollees in at least 13 states (Alaska, Connecticut, DC, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Maine, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Nevada, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont), with Maine enrollees gaining the most at around $1500 per market participant annually, whereas Oregon (a state with severe glitches on its website and roll-out) experienced the greatest loss – around $850 annually per participant." (The Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act -Primary Source). The measure of welfare used is determined by a formula based on enrollment figures, changes to premiums and changes to the cost of providing care.


Also out this week is an Urban Institute study of the impact of the ACA on the uninsured rate for children. The findings show that Obamacare has reduced the uninsured rate for virtually everyone — except kids. This result is hardly surprising, given the already low rate of uninsured among children (thanks to Medicaid and CHIP). It's hard to get those last few percentage points. In Health Affairs you can read the study's authors discussion of the results: A First Look At How The Affordable Care Act Is Affecting Coverage Among Parents And Children.

But wait, there's more!  Yet another study looks at the quality of care provided by those "narrow networks" everyone's been talking about. It finds that Narrow Health Networks: Maybe They’re Not So Bad and  Maybe You Don't Need a Big Doctor Network to Get Good Care: Injecting some data into an Obamacare controversy.

Thought I was done with the studies?  No, one more, this one from JAMA which asks: Obamacare lets young adults stay on their parents’ insurance longer. Has that made them better off?   The bottom line answer is "not so much". "...the results are a reminder that providing health insurance is just one part of the equation. Changing someone's behavior can be tougher."

And finally, while all these studies and all the data are important, sometimes it takes a story to drive a point home. Here is a look at how the ACA changed one woman's life: The simple ways health insurance can change your life. A great reminder of what this is all about.

Costs
Last week saw the release of lots of cost data, this week the Census Bureau has it's say: Census Bureau: Health Costs Inch Up As Obamacare Kicks In. Here's the bottom line: " CMS is the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the government's main health care bookkeeper. Last week CMS projected that health-expenditure growth would accelerate to 5.6 percent this year from an estimated 3.6 percent in 2013. ... But health and social spending as measured by the Census Bureau grew by only 3.7 percent from the second quarter of 2013 to the same quarter of 2014."

Or to put it another way, as of this quarter health spending increases are still on track to remain at historically low levels. As Sarah Kliff puts it, we are in The "pay less, get more" era of health care.

Medicaid
The GAO took a look at the Arkansas Medicaid Private Option program and had some issues:  MEDICAID DEMONSTRATIONS: HHS's Approval Process for Arkansas's Medicaid Expansion Waiver Raises Cost Concerns (Primary Source). The plan (over its first three years) is supposed to be revenue neutral when measured against traditional Medicaid. However the findings found: GAO: Arkansas Medicaid plan not revenue-neutral. It will be interesting to see how the program develops over the rest of the three year period, but so far it's not clear that what was heralded as an innovative approach to bring market forces to bear on Medicaid will end up working out as advertised.

On the state front, we have two developments. First, Utah Gov. Gary Herbert: We have a ‘conceptual’ deal on Medicaid. Like several other states, when Utah began these conversations they wanted a work provision as part of the eligibility criteria. So far, that's been a line in the sand that HHS has not crossed. Reports are that it remains so as "HHS did not agree that insurance subsidies would be contingent on recipients holding a job or looking for work, but the agency did agree that employment can be a goal of Utah’s program, Healthy Utah."

Second, in Virginal where the legislature has thwarted the Governor's expansion plans, a very small alternative was offered by the Governor: With Medicaid expansion blocked, McAuliffe unveils modest plan to insure more Virginians (this would only benefit 25,000 people vs. the 400,000 who could benefit from expansion).

Medicare
Kaiser likes their graphics - in cooperation with JAMA they continue their Visualizing Health Policy series with a look at Medicare Advantage:  Visualizing Health Policy: The Role of Medicare Advantage.

VA
While the coverage has calmed down, the work to reform the Veterans'' Administration continues. This week at the same time as the New V.A. Secretary Says Hiring Spree Is Needed to Meet Patient Demand, the Watchdog Says V.A. Officials Lied.

Drugs
Drugs can be lifesavers, but they also can be unnecessary and expensive. A look at how Dementia patients continue to get medications with little, no benefit. Sometimes this is due to inertia, but that's not an excuse for subjecting the patient to possible side effects and added expense for no benefit.

On a positive note, announced this week that the D.E.A. to Allow Return of Unused Pills to Pharmacies. Previously there were only two national prescription drug collection days a year and pharmacies were not allowed to take back unneeded medications. With these new proposed rules that will change.

After rejecting the same drug several years ago, this week a New Drug to Treat Obesity Gains Approval by F.D.A.. More research was done to better understand the drug's impact on heart attacks and the results satisfied the regulators.

System Transformation
More studies!  Two papers from the Commonwealth Fund looking across countries. First A Comparison of Hospital Administrative Costs in Eight Nations: U.S. Costs Exceed All Others by Far. No surprise there, but this report puts numbers to something we already guessed. Second, A Comparison of How Four Countries Use Health IT to Support Care for People with Chronic Conditions. Results a little more nuanced here as the report talks about each countries approach and what we can learn from each other.

On the vaccine front Nova focuses on the issue with a new episode Vaccines—Calling the Shots. And here a pediatrician reminds us that The vaccination decision isn’t a purely personal one. And finally, a novel approach finds that Australia's free HPV vaccine program is a big success.

The New York Times asks Can We Have a Fact-Based Conversation About End-of-Life Planning?  It hasn't been possible so far, but maybe we're getting close. The AMA is recommending that physician's be reimbursed for these conversations, but that begs the questions End-of-life discussions: Is extra reimbursement enough? Spoiler alert, the answer is probably not, but at least it's a start. And finally a reminder that it's hard for both parties in the conversation: Doctors cannot speak about the reality of death and dying. Yes it's hard, but they need to as shown by this story of how a little clarity made all the difference in the world to a family.

Good news on the transparency front - not price transparency but system transparency.  First, the Feds reverse course, will release hospital mistake data. Previously they'd said the database was no longer useful, but at the public outcry they changed their minds and will continue to update the database. Second, the Open Payments Database: Despite Criticism, Still On Track To Let The Sunshine In. While the first iteration will be more limited than originally hoped for, better some data now than no data now.

Ever wonder how doctors ask each other questions?  Turns out some of them use their smart phones: Instagram for doctors: How one app is solving medical mysteries. In the technology age, a replacement for the hallway consult.

Studies show that looking for medical information is one of the most common uses of Google. Well, Stop Googling your health questions. Use these sites instead.  A guide on where to start your search for reliable information.

And finally, our comic medical video of the week. From the mind that brought you Doctor House of Cards a look at childhood obesity:  Baby Phat | Lady Gaga Poker Face Parody | ZDoggMD  


All comments and suggestions are welcome; please let me know what you think. And as always, thanks for reading!

Funded by support from the Maine Health Access Foundation
*The title is a tribute to the BBC show, the NBC show

Friday, September 5, 2014

That Was The Week That Was - Issue 26

A look back at the week's health policy news with a focus on ACA implementation

I always say lots to talk about this week, this week that's an understatement! We have news of an en banc review by the DC court, a look at marketplace premiums, details of the reenrollment process, news of a data breach at healthcare.gov, cost projections, drug innovations, and on and on ending with the funny medical video of the week.

One formatting note, in the study discussed below, the Office of the Actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is no longer separating out ACA effects from their overall cost projections. If they say that the ACA is now so much a part of the system those effects can't be separated, it must be true. So, I'm now combining the ACA Cost and Cost sections.

And speaking of sections, some pieces are so broad that they transcend any attempt to classify them. That's the case with this exceptional piece: 8 facts that explain what’s wrong with American health care. We've talked about pieces covered in other issues, but this is the best collection of current thinking I've seen. Read and share widely!

ACA: Court Cases
Movement this week on the cases around if subsidies should be available on the Federal Marketplace. Early in the week, the clerk of the Supreme Court granted a 30 day delay for the Feds to respond to the petition to have the case brought to them immediately:  Delay on health care subsidies case. Among the reasons the Feds asked for the delay was to see if the D.C. Circuit would grant the petition for an en banc review, that is for the full court to hear the case instead of the 3 judge panel that turned in the earlier ruling prohibiting the subsidies. Later in the week, that en banc review was granted: This is good for Obamacare: DC Circuit court will review Halbig.

This makes the chances of an expedited review by the Supremes much less likely as well as raising the probability that they may never get the case (if all the Circuit rulings end up agreeing). This piece looks in detail at the situation: Obamacare Lawsuits Just Suffered a Big Setback - What it means and how the legal challenge could play out. The piece from our friends at scotusblog tell us about the timing, reminding us that the wheels of justice turn slowly:  "In ordering rehearing, the D.C. Circuit set the case for a hearing on December 17. It laid out a briefing schedule beginning on October 3 and due to be completed on November 17. The parties were cautioned that they had little chance of gaining extra time to file briefs." (Full D.C. Circuit will rule on health care subsidies)  For even more on the topic, here is Tim Jost's take: Implementing Health Reform: DC Circuit Vacates Halbig Judgment, Grants Rehearing

ACA: Polls/Opposition
The Editorial Board of the NY Times is tired of the Endless Assault on Health Care Reform, and so am I.

Ezra Klein notes that "The electorate moving on means Obamacare's mounting achievements don't get nearly the attention of its early failures. But the law, at this point, is doing more than simply defying the doomsayers; it's proving to be a real policy success."  (The Obamacare train keeps not wrecking - for more detail on the Kaiser premium study referenced, see the ACA: Premium section below).

Meanwhile, the critics aren't going away, not that they have anything new to say as Karl Rove recycles years-old attacks on Obamacare.

Also this week, Tim Jost takes a look at what is probably the most complete "alternative" to the ACA offered by opponents, and not surprisingly he finds parts of it lacking: Transcending Obamacare? Analyzing Avik Roy’s ACA Replacement Plan.

At the end of his review, he talks about the issue of the complexity of the ACA (this alternative would do nothing to change that) and notes: "One of the greatest defects of the ACA is its complexity. That complexity has required the Obama administration to exercise considerable creativity in implementing the law. But the law’s complexity simply follows from the fact that the drafters of the ACA attempted to build on, rather than to radically change, our current, impossibly complex, health care system."  Or to put it another way, the complexity of the law arises because it's not a government takeover of health care, not because it is. It builds on the existing complex system, so you end up with a complex law.

ACA: Premiums
Kaiser released an analysis of preliminary marketplace premiums. In 16 markets they looked at the benchmark silver plans (the second least expensive plan on which the subsidies are based) and the lowest cost Bronze plans (one of the markets included is our very own Portland Me). The Early Results: Average 2015 Exchange Premiums Decline Slightly. This is more evidence that all those naysayers who said rates would explode in the second year were wrong  You can read the full report here: Analysis of 2015 Premium Changes in the Affordable Care Act’s Health Insurance Marketplaces (Primary Source).

Part of the reason for the results may be the direct competition found in the marketplaces. Austin Frakt asked the question What Happens When Health Plans Compete and found the answer was that, as theorized in the creation of the marketplaces, rates do in fact go down.

ACA: Marketplaces
As the summer ends and we get closer to the next open-enrollment (11/15) lots to report regarding the marketplaces.

Starting off, CMS announced the auto-enrollment process that will be used for those currently enrolled in a marketplace plan: Fact sheets: CMS finalizes auto-enrollment process for current Marketplace consumers (Primary Source). The motivation for the auto-enrollment is to keep people covered (similar to what happens with your life or auto insurance). However the process does not come without its pitfalls: "Consumers who auto-renew their policies will get the same dollar value of subsidies they got last year—even though changes in the marketplace all but guarantee that will no longer be the right subsidy amount for millions of people. ... "That's the totally crazy part," Pearson said. "They're basically going to send them what they know to be the wrong subsidy."" (If You Like Your Obamacare Plan, It'll Cost You)

In addition to the subsidy issue the individual will also be impacted by a change in what the benchmark plan is in their area. Remember, the subsidy is based on the second lowest cost silver plan. If that is now a different plan, depending on the relative cost of their current plan, the individual may now be responsible for a larger share of their premiums if they don't switch to the new benchmark plan (or another lower cost option). For more details on the process (for now, we'll have lots more in the coming weeks) here is a review of the final rule: Implementing Health Reform: Exchange Eligibility Redeterminations Final Rule.

The NY Times takes a look at this and other issues coming up: Bracing for New Challenges in Year 2 of Health Care Law. While we're reminded that Consumers Will Owe Uncle Sam If They Got Health Insurance Subsidies Mistakenly.

Health insurance is complicated for everyone. Drew Altman reminds us that there is A Perilous Gap in Health Insurance Literacy - "46% of enrollees in the new insurance marketplaces say they’re getting a subsidy, when official numbers indicate about 85% actually get them."  And here is a look at what this means in practical terms: Enrolling People In Obamacare Who Have No 'Concept Of Insurance'. And a little data to drive home the point, while this survey involved people choosing their employer-sponsored plans, we can be sure it's not much different in the individual market: Many spend 15 minutes or less picking health insurance.

Today (9/5) is the deadline for some who had documentation issues with their applications to get their paperwork filed. Unfortunately, the full court press of the past month has not yielded the hoped for results as Problems abound with health law immigration papers.

Also this week, reports that Hackers Breach Security of HealthCare.gov . This breach does not seem to be too serious: "“Our review indicates that the server did not contain consumer personal information, data was not transmitted outside the agency and the website was not specifically targeted,” said Aaron Albright, a spokesman at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which runs the website. “We have taken measures to further strengthen security.”" However that doesn't mean we won't be hearing about it now and next week when Congress returns as GOP chorus attacks Obamacare over Healthcare.gov hack.

I'll note that while any security breach is serious, and we want the administrators of healthcare.gov to be more diligent, this issue is not unique to healthcare.gov. The issue of computer security is in the news every week (this week with Apple cloud storage and use of credit cards at Home Depot ), it's a major issue that needs to be addressed. That said it should have no bearing on the discussion of the usefulness of the Federal Marketplace.

ACA: Employers
Some good news on the employer front as CMS announced that Five States To Get Early Access To Small Business Health Insurance Marketplace. Last year the SHOP (small group marketplace) went lacking as all the focus was on getting the individual marketplace up and running. This announcement that the new SHOP functionality (on-line enrollment and in some states employee choice) will be piloted in five states in advance of a national rollout in November is the most concrete sign we've had that the promised upgrades to the SHOP are on track.

A look at how High Health Plan Deductibles Weigh Down More Employees. This is an issue for those in employee plans and for those in individual plans as well. Remember, high deductibles (and other cost sharing) has been shown to reduce expenses, but it does so indiscriminately by reducing both needed and less critical care. We also have these survey results on employer-sponsored plans: How People Feel About Their Employer-Sponsored Health Plans. Note that part of the results are that some have trouble with high deductibles and co-pays.

Also this week, another look at the issue of if the ACA is forcing an increase in the use of part-timers. The Urban Institute found Little Evidence of the ACA Increasing Part-Time Work So Far. While this is good data there is no denying the anecdotes of employers that are cutting hours due to the ACA. We can debate the scope of the issue, but not that it exists. (We can make also make an educated guess that opponents of the law are overstating the problem as supporters of the law are understating it.)

ACA: Other
Taxes... Yes we have to get through open-enrollment before we hit tax time, but it's worth talking about as the actions people take now and during enrollment will impact their returns. H&R Block certainly thinks so as they are gearing up: H&R Block getting ready for the Affordable Care Act’s impact on tax season next year. At the same time, the IRS released instructions for some of the forms employers (and others) will be filing: Implementing Health Reform: Tax Form Instructions. One of those "and others" is healthcare.gov itself - the marketplace will need to be getting forms to individuals indicating the amount of subsidies advanced to enable individuals to fill out their returns. Some say that the Tax Forms Could Pose Challenge For Healthcare.gov.

Costs
As I said up top, since the Since Office of the Actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) no longer separates out ACA effects from cost projections. If it's good enough for CMS it's good enough for me. Going forward I will have a single cost section instead of one labeled ACA: Cost and one labeled Cost. (This also highlights the issue inherent in any taxonomy including mine, coming up with mutually exclusive categories is hard!)

The big news this week was the release by the above referenced CMS Office of the Actuary of their annual report on healthcare costs. Buckle up as we move forward, it could get a little bumpy. Fist the report: National Health Expenditure Projections, 2013–23: Faster Growth Expected With Expanded Coverage And Improving Economy (Primary Source).

Before we look at what they said, let's review some basics. Costs are made up of the price of the item and how many of them you use. The same is true in health care, except were not talking about a single item, but lots of different components (services, drugs etc) that make up health care. When you look at costs over time, you need to project how the prices will change and how the volume will change. Compounding the complexity for health care you also need to figure out the introduction of new components and how the use of existing components will change. (One of the biggest factors in the change in use of existing components is the aging of the population - the older we get the more health care services we use.)

So what did the report say?  We'll start with the bottom line, costs are continuing to go up and if these projections are correct, at the end of the ten year period health care will make up one fifth of our economy (CMS: Health spending to hit $5.2T within years). But that's a big "if". Which brings us to our next point. After Slow Growth, Experts Say, Health Spending Is Expected to Climb. We've been seeing historically slow growth in health care spending. No one is really sure why although it's clear part is due to the overall economic slowdown and part is due to systemic changes (some brought about by the ACA). The question is, what is the proportion of each of those factors. If it's more the economy then costs increases will start to accelerate - and that's exactly what the CMS actuaries expect to happen (The end of health care’s historic spending slowdown is near).

So if you agree that most of the recent slowdown in costs is the result of the economy you would agree with this report, if you don't then you might consider it overly conservative. My favorite headline comes from the New Republic which tries to cover all the bases: New Report: Health Care Costs Are Escalating Much More Slowly - But still not clear how long slowdown will last—or why it's happening.

This report comes on the heels of last week's CBO report on Medicare spending. A very exciting chart extracted from that report shows that Per Capita Medicare Spending Is Actually Falling.

Taken together (and adding other factors) Vox gives us Five reasons health care is no longer seen as monstrous budget buster. Since even if the CBO report is accurate, the projections still represent a substantial improvement over previous year's projections.

As if that's not enough, we have a report on MA state based efforts to go at the cost problem: Massachusetts wants to upend health care. Again.

We also have a new paper from the Center from American Progress where Democrats borrow a GOP idea on health care costs and put the onus for innovation on the states. (Accountable Care States - The Future of Health Care Cost Control (Primary Source))

Last week we talked about the idea of the 125% solution. For once I was ahead of Ezra - this week he takes a look at the idea( again, not a bad step, but not going to happen): The 125 percent solution for American health care.

Medicaid
Last week, PA announced they would be participating in the Medicaid Expansion. This week the Washington Post (23 states still haven’t expanded Medicaid. Which could be next?) and Kaiser (Indiana, Several Other States Look To Expand Medicaid Next Year) take a look at who could be next.

One thing we learned from PA is that while CMS is willing to negotiate (too much so in some people's opinions), there is A bright 'red line:' What the White House won't do to woo GOP governors into Obamacare, namely Medicaid coverage can't be made contingent on employment.

Maine was the focus of national attention with the same article appearing last weekend in USA today and then during the week on the Kaiser website: Maine's health care model: Go smaller / Maine Rolls Back Health Coverage Even As Many States Expand It.

A Reminder yet again how misguided it is not to participate: States that decline to expand Medicaid give up billions in aid. And not just for the state, but for the state's hospitals as well: Obamacare Is Big Business for Hospitals - Hospital profits are soaring in states that accepted the Medicaid expansion.

Medicare
More talk about Medicare Advantage plans. This week not debating their merits but identifying their abuses: Upcoding in Medicare Advantage: Transparency can clean the mess. At the same time, Medicare offered hospitals the option to settle outstanding claims - expedited payment but at a reduced rate: Medicare Will Settle Short-Term Care Bills

VA/Military
This next story is not directly related to the VA issues we've been covering, but still worth mentioning: Smaller Military Hospitals Said to Put Patients at Risk. In addition to the travesty of putting active duty personnel and their families at risk, this story is a cautionary tale regarding small hospitals. Namely, if they are not doing sufficient volume, patient care will suffer. So while many have the knee jerk reaction that it's not a good idea to close hospitals, in fact doing so may have both cost and quality benefits.

Drugs
This week we'll take a break from all the problems of the drug industry and focus on three exciting new developments:


System Transformation
So many stories, so little time... Before I start this section I have to tell you that I've cut out half the items I wanted to share this week, so no complaining that the post is to long :)

First up, two pieces that to put it bluntly, tell us to question authority:  Beware your doctor’s knee jerk reflex: 3 questions to ask and Is much of the annual physical a waste of time? spoiler alert... yes

We often talk about big data and its promise, but here is a cautionary note about how it works in light of the need for a patient-centered approach: Can Big Data and patient-informed consent coexist?  But in case that piece gave you pause, here is a reminder of how much it is needed: Big Data And The Public’s Health: Building Resilience For The 21st Century

CVS made good a month early on its pledge to stop selling tobacco products: CVS Stops Tobacco Sales Today, Changes Name To Reflect New Era. Straight from the source a piece by company executives as to why they did it: Integrity In Retail Health Care: Rethinking The Sale Of Tobacco Products .

Bad vaccination news out of CA as Plunge in kindergartners' vaccination rate worries health officials. And a look at why it's happening (and worse in CA then elsewhere): Rich, educated and stupid parents are driving the vaccination crisis. It has been said that as climate change denial is to the right, anti-vaccination beliefs are to the left. Both deny science and reality. I would not disagree...

Also on the vaccination front, a reminder that it's not just children. Take up rates for the shingles vaccine among seniors have not been as high as hoped for: A Vaccine Mystery Hits Older Americans


And this look at all the conflicting diet studies that get covered by the media: The one thing you need to know about weight loss and diet studies.

Lots on the end of life front this week (get your tissues ready).

Next some hope as Coverage for End-of-Life Talks Gaining Ground. Five years after one of the biggest lies in the health care debate, death panels, coverage for these crucial conversations is growing (and may even make it to Medicare next year).

An important part of end of lie care can be hospice, but Is one hospice the same as any other? No. Why it’s important to choose carefully.  My take (feel free to ignore) is that while there are some good for-profit hospice organizations and some bad not-for-profit ones, those are the exceptions. It's not a bad idea to start out looking at the not-for-profit organizations available.

Read at your own risk: This surprising request brought an emergency doctor to tears  "“But now, I’m done. I’m ready to ‘go home’ and I need hospice to help my sweet wife to get ready for me dying,” he said as he reached out his wrist nub to pat my hand."

OK, everyone dry your eyes.

We'll end with a smile by bringing back the funny medical video of the week with this parody of the movie Divergent:  SNACKPOCALYPSE with Chloe Grace Moretz, Tyler Posey, and First Lady Michelle Obama


All comments and suggestions are welcome; please let me know what you think. And as always, thanks for reading!

Funded by support from the Maine Health Access Foundation
*The title is a tribute to the BBC show, the NBC show and the amazing Tom Lehrer album "That Was The Year That Was"