Sunday, February 22, 2015

That Was The Week That Was - Weekend Update 2-22-15

Health policy news waits for no one. For scheduling reasons I've recently been publishing the weekly blog on Thursday night.  This week, CMS decided they would have some fun with me and released a slew of announcements on Friday. I'll cover all of these issues in more detail with next week’s blog, but in the meantime, here is some information to tide you over.

The announcements included:
  • Special enrollment period for tax filers subject to penalty
  • 800,000 Incorrect Tax forms mailed
  • New rules for 2016 open enrollment and plans
  • Medicare announcements


Special enrollment period for tax filers subject to penalty
In perhaps the least surprising announcement ever, CMS announced there will be a special enrollment period from March 15 to April 30 for those who find out they have to pay a penalty (shared responsibility payment) for not being covered in 2014 and are not enrolled in a plan for 2015.


And the NY Times reviews the situation: A Second Chance to Avoid a Second Tax Penalty Over Obamacare “The department’s decision reflects two realities: 1) Confusion about how Obamacare works remains very high. Several surveys have shown that many of the uninsured don’t understand that there are deadlines for coverage, penalties for failing to get insurance, or financial assistance that might make insurance affordable. 2) There’s a basic mismatch between enrollment season and tax season that interferes with the incentive structure of the law. The punishment for not being insured last year comes too late to sign up for this year. That means that without the special period, many people would have been doomed to pay two years’ worth of penalties.”

800,000 Incorrect Tax forms mailed
In a goof that does not help us make the argument that government programs can run efficiently, HHS announced they sent out 800,000 incorrect forms.  These were forms 1095-A which are needed to allow individuals to calculate the actual APTCs (advanced premium tax credits) they are entitled to as opposed to the amount estimated during enrollment.  Some of these forms contain the wrong benchmark premium, an amount needed to correctly calculate the appropriate APTC.

You can read details here: The government sent 800,000 Obamacare enrollees inaccurate tax forms “Approximately 800,000 people who bought coverage through Healthcare.gov received inaccurate tax filing documents, federal officials said Friday. These forms had the wrong price for the local "benchmark plan:" an important number that the government uses to calculate every Obamacare enrollee's subsidy.”

And the NY Times provides this helpful FAQ: What to Do if You Got the Wrong Tax Forms

New rules for 2016 open enrollment and plans
While 2015 open enrollment completed, it’s not too soon to be thinking about 2016.  In a series of announcements, CMS released final details on many provisions: Press release: CMS issues the final HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2016 and Final HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2016 (CMS Fact Sheet)

As of this writing, Tim Jost has released two pieces on the rules – he is planning on releasing two more in the coming days which I will cover next week.



Here are some of what I consider the most significant announcements:
  • The rule finalizes the annual open enrollment period for 2016 to begin on November 1, 2015 and run through January 31, 2016.  Note this is a change from what was previously planned.
  • Network directories must be up-to-date, accurate, plan specific and complete (including if the provider is accepting new patients).  Issuers also must make this information available in standard, machine-readable formats accessible without creating an account.
  • Formularies most also be posted and accessible without an account, also machine readable.
  • Machine readable means that third party vendors will be able to produce decision support tools to assist with the process.
  • Auto reenrollment stays the same as this year – they will not change as originally proposed to account for lower cost plans.  Individuals will be reenrolled in their same plan regardless of changes in premium.
  • CMS intends to continue to use the state EHB benchmark approach through at least plan year 2017 rather than define EHB itself.
  • Plans are warned against back-door discrimination such as what happened in FL where certain plans put all HIV drugs in a specialty tier thereby discouraging enrollment of those who needed the drugs.
  • Changes to the definition of essential community providers (those interested in details should read the second Tim Jost link above).
  • Some changes to special enrollment rules, including allowing special enrollment period if income increases over 100% FPL threshold making them eligible for APTCs.


Medicare announcements
CMS announced proposed payment factors for 2016 Medicare Advantage and Part D plans: Press release: CMS proposes 2016 payment and policy updates for Medicare Health and Drug Plans

Most significantly is the proposed Medicare Advantage rate increase.  However, what was released is far from final: “The CMS has proposed increasing health insurers' Medicare Advantage payment rates by 1.05% for 2016, a move that kicks off a 45-day dogfight in Washington before the rates are cemented. The base rate was an 0.95% average decrease, but "when combined with expected growth in plan risk scores due to coding," Advantage plans will actually receive the 1.05% hike in revenue next year, according to a release from the CMS posted late Friday afternoon.” (CMS pitches 1.1% boost to Medicare Advantage payments)

A significant element in how Medicare Advantage plan rates are set is the risk score assigned to the plan. We covered last week how suspect these scores are.  Here is a piece published before the new rates were announced reviewing the topic: Reducing Medicare Advantage Overpayments “Upcoding is a long-standing problem in Medicare Advantage, as CBO and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have documented.  According to MedPAC, risk scores were 8 percent higher in Medicare Advantage, on average, than in traditional Medicare for comparable beneficiaries.  And MedPAC analysts noted that the amount of upcoding seems to be getting larger.”

And finally, on Friday CMS also announced a change in the way Nursing Home ratings are assigned: Press release: CMS Strengthens Five Star Quality Rating System for Nursing Homes

“The star ratings of nearly a third of the nation’s nursing homes were lowered on Friday, as federal officials readjusted quality standards in the face of criticism that the ratings were inaccurate and artificially inflated.” (Medicare Toughens Standards on Nursing Homes)


Thanks for reading.