Friday, December 5, 2014

That Was The Week That Was - Issue 39

A look back at the week's health policy news with a focus on ACA implementation

3.6%, 12.4%, 50,000, 765,000: Those four numbers represent four different pieces of information released this week that shows the ACA is working. That’s not to say healthcare is fixed and we can all go home, not by any stretch of the imagination. There is still a lot of work to do and people who need help. The law continues to be threatened and undermined and even if it were working perfectly, it would not be enough. But for today, for a few minutes, we can be thankful some things are moving in the right direction.

Oh, you want to know what those numbers represent?  In order listed above they are: the rate health spending grew in 2013 – the lowest recorded since the government started measuring the figure in 1960 (see the Cost section below), the latest figure on the rate of uninsured in this country – a decline of 30% from a year earlier  (see the Enrollment section below), the number of lives saved by the reduction in medical errors over the past 3 years (see the System Transformation section below), and finally, the number of people who have selected a plan in the first two weeks of open enrollment (see Enrollment section below).

This week we have details on those figures, new ACO regulations and as always, much, much more. So let’s get started.

ACA: Opposition/Support
Sometimes Democrats are their own worst enemy – last week Sen Schumer said passing the ACA was a mistake. Here is another look at why he is wrong: On Obamacare, could all Democrats really be as clueless as Sen. Schumer? Since we seem to be living in bizarro-world, this week while Democrats regretted passing the law the former Republican Senate Majority Leader supported it saying that Republicans should fix the ACA, not continue to hope that the courts overturn it: Trent Lott Encourages GOP To Make Fix To Obamacare Before Supreme Court Case

I wasn't the only person this week thinking about good news, The Brookings Institution also asked the question: Is Obamacare Working? Yes.  Vox chimed in: The Obamacare paradox: the law looks terrible but is doing great as did New York Magazine: 4 New Studies Show Obamacare Is Working Incredibly Well

ACA: Court Cases
Developments in two cases this week, the subsidy case and the House GOP suit of the President.
Starting with the subsidy case, for those interested in the legal arguments this is one of the best pieces I’ve seen on why the case should fail Am I unreasonable? And here are some additions to the legal arguments: A couple of overlooked context clues in King and thoughts on why The Latest Challenge to Obamacare Should Embarrass Conservative Judges.

Some think that Mitch McConnell Just Made a Huge Tactical Mistake by Begging the Supreme Court to Gut Obamacare personally, I don’t think it will have an impact, but it’s a nice thought.

USA Today took a look at what would happen if the Court says subsidies can only be offered in State Exchanges: Experts: No easy options if court strikes down ACA. At the same time, in a review of what states are doing to prepare for the Court’s decision, the answer was not much: 32 States Haven't Tried To Establish an Exchange. Are They Making a Huge Mistake?

Regarding the House GOP suit of the President, focus on the part of the suit concerning the out-of-pocket subsidies. These subsidies are paid directly to insurance companies to lower the copays, coinsurance and/or deductibles paid by those with income below 250% of the Federal Poverty Level. The suit says that the Administration paying those out of the same account as the tax credit subsidies is wrong: Obamacare lawsuit tests 'power of the purse' and Suit on Health Law Puts Focus on Funding Powers.

ACA: Enrollment
Unlike last year, HHS has committed to releasing weekly enrollment reports during the open enrollment period. In the first week Healthcare.gov signed up 462,125 customers. And while Health law sign-ups slowed over Thanksgiving by the end of the second week Obamacare Sign-Ups Top 765,000. Things should only get busier from here as we approach December 15 – the deadline for anyone who wants coverage to begin on Jan 1 including those who want to make changes to their coverage before the New Year. Although while it’s not advised, it is possible for those who are automatically reenrolled in their current plan to still make changes after Dec. 15 – they can pick a new plan at any time during the open enrollment period and drop the coverage they were reenrolled in. You can see the full release from HHS here: Open Enrollment Week 2: November 22 – November 28, 2014

What impact did the first open enrollment have (and the first year of coverage)?  12.4% is the latest figure released by the Urban Institute for the percent uninsured in the country. That represents a decline of 30% from a year earlier (Uninsured rate keeps dropping as second open-enrollment period progresses). It’s worth noting that there is a big discrepancy between states that expanded Medicaid and those that did not “In non-expansion states, the uninsured rate has dropped from 20.1% to 15.1% over the last year. In states that have adopted Medicaid expansion, the uninsured rate dropped from 15% to 10.2% since the exchanges were launched.” Here is the full report from the Urban Institute: Taking Stock: Health Insurance Coverage under the ACA as of September 2014.

ACA: Marketplaces
We’ve talked about the reenrollment issue before, the need for those who currently have coverage to review their choices before being automatically enrolled in the same plan for next year. This week HHS issued a report attempting to quantify the benefit of shopping around: HHS: Switching Obamacare Insurance Plans Could Save Consumers More Than $2 Billion. As one report from the Washington Post put it: The administration is begging Obamacare enrollees to shop around for a better deal. You can read the full report here: Report shows more options and savings for consumers who shop in the Health Insurance Marketplace in 2015.

What it comes down to is inertia – the tendency of people to leave things as they are. NY Magazine takes a more detailed look at the problem here: Obamacare’s Inertia Problem

The reason to shop around is not just to check premiums. Sometimes a plan will change certain provisions while still remaining the same plan: “But tucked within the plans' jargon are changes that could markedly affect how much consumers pay for health care. Generic drugs will soon be free, but the cost of expensive specialty medications will increase. Co-payments for visits to primary-care doctors will go down, but those for emergency room trips will be higher.” (Big Changes in Fine Print of Some 2015 Health Plans). How can consumers figure out what’s going on? Propublica has an app for that!  They've created a comparison tool that lets you compare key cost-sharing provisions of any 2014 plan with any 2015 plan. It’s definitely worth taking a look: Will My Obamacare Health Plan Costs Go Up? Compare before you renew your health insurance plan.

Finally Kaiser took a look at Who Is Getting ACA Insurance – And Who Isn’t.

ACA: Premiums/Affordability
One of the ways the marketplace brings costs down is by fostering competition. In a look at the state of markets in 2013 (before the Marketplaces opened) they found that oligopolies – market domination by just a few large players – was the norm: Health insurance markets dominated by oligopolies before Obamacare: report. This look from Kaiser found that More Competition Helps Restrain Premiums In Federal Health Marketplace.

But even when everything is working as it’s supposed to, Underinsurance Remains Big Problem Under Obama Health Law (and a continuation by the same author Underinsurance, ctd.). For some, even with help, the cost sharing provisions are still too much. This Gallup survey found that Cost Still a Barrier Between Americans and Medical Care. In a different world, instead of continuing to fight for the laws very existence, we would be focusing on how to improve it.

ACA: Employers
The Maine Chamber of Commerce held a business forum to help get the word out to employers about their responsibilities (this was one I actually did not speak at). For a group that has been a steadfast opponent of the law, it’s nice to see them helping their members deal with reality: Maine Businesses Gear Up for Affordable Care Act's 'Employer Mandate'.

Regarding the SHOP, HealthCare.gov’s insurance marketplace for small businesses gets off to a slow start. The issue is that other than for the minority of small businesses that qualify for a premium tax credit, there is no great advantage to utilizing the online marketplace. The may change next year if employers get excited about the ability to offer their employees a choice of plans through the SHOP, instead of just the one option most small employers now offer.

More evidence of something we’ve discussed before: Workplace wellness programs don’t save money. At the same time, the administration is challenging employers who seem to be trying to stretch the rules with what is and is not permitted: EEOC Takes Aim At Wellness Programs Increasingly Offered By Employers. Given that we know they don’t really help the employers, it was surprising to see that U.S. CEOs threaten to pull tacit Obamacare support over 'wellness' spat. It’s not clear to me what their continued allegiance to the concept is given the mounting evidence of their ineffectiveness.

Costs
So much coverage, so little space. The office of the Actuary (OACT) at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released its annual report on health expenditures. I could fill this blog with reporting and analysis of the report, but in the interests of not putting all of you to sleep I will keep it short.

To start, for those interested, here is the press release: Press release: National Health Expenditures continued slow growth in 2013 and here are the initial results Health Affairs Web First: National Health Spending In 2013 Continued Pattern Of Low Growth (primary source).

The topline story is that in 2013 medical expenditures increased only 3.6% - the lowest percentage increase since they started measuring that statistic in 1960!  (Health costs in 2013 grew at slowest rate since 1960)  While many saw Good News Inside the Health Spending Numbers, the question persists can it last?  (America's Medical Bill Didn't Spike Last Year: More good news, although it's hard to know how long it will last)

Some think that the slowdown is due to the economy, and there is no doubt that is one factor, but is more going on here?  When looking more closely, this slowdown has not mirrored behavior in previous recessions, so it seems probable that The Health-Cost Slowdown Isn’t Just About the Economy.


In other major cost news this week, CMS released new proposed rules for Accountable Care Organizations (Press release: CMS releases new proposal to improve Accountable Care Organizations and Fact sheets: Proposed Changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program Regulations).

The new rules would make it easier for ACOs to develop without risking their payments (Draft Medicare ACO rules would allow more time with less risk) If you’re asking Why Medicare won't force penalties on ACOs that don't save money, the answer is that CMS continues to believe in the program and wants to give participating providers time to ramp up. It is feared that if the existing penalty structure remained in place organizations would not join the program for fear of losing money before they figured out how to operate.

Medicaid
Medicaid expansion news in many states this week (although alas, Maine is not one of them):



Florida: Yes, even Florida is considering expansion Medicaid Expansion By Any Other Name May Fly For Florida Lawmakers

In Pennsylvania expansion proceeds but under a cloud of confusion: Pennsylvania launches Medicaid expansion, overhaul “Democratic Gov.-elect Tom Wolf has said he opposes what he views as an unnecessarily complicated process and bureaucracy being set up by Corbett, and Wolf could gradually unwind some elements of Corbett's plan after he takes office Jan. 20. Meanwhile, the federal government has not approved the final benefit packages proposed by the Corbett administration for both the overhaul and expansion of Pennsylvania's Medicaid program, injecting more uncertainty into how exactly everything will change.”

Kaiser took a look at all the private option expansion plans: The ACA and Recent Section 1115 Medicaid Demonstration Waivers Note that it doesn’t include several of the ones listed above since they have not yet received final approval from CMS.

In CHIP news, some good signs regarding renewal of funding: “The consensus was apparent at a subcommittee hearing of the House Energy and Commerce panel, where Republicans and Democrats praised CHIP's benefits in equal measure.” (Lawmakers: Kids will lose coverage without CHIP funding) But talk is cheap and none of the statements ruled out changes to the program when the renewed funding was considered. With respect to timing, while it’s being talked about it is not expected that the lame duck session will do anything (Little action expected on CHIP funding by year-end) so stay tuned for more developments next year.

Medicare
This week in Medicare news, many instances of misbehavior on the part of providers, offered with minimal editorial comment:



Medicare is doing more to police Advantage and Part D lapses, but does it matter?  “Medicare Advantage plans among publicly traded insurers usually net a profit margin between 5% and 6%.”   “Critics of the program question whether the five- and six-digit monetary penalties do enough to change behavior. “The revenue (plans) take in from the federal government is just enormous,” said Wendell Potter, a former PR executive at Cigna Corp. who has testified several times to Congress about the health insurance industry. He is now an analyst at the Center for Public Integrity. “That's not a significant fine or monetary punishment if you ask me.””

Were patients really sicker? Lawsuits say Medicare Advantage plans inflated diagnoses to boost payments time once again for my favorite clip… I’m shocked!  Recently I wrote about a growing convergence of interests between insurers and the Administration (and advocates). Here is a case where that’s not yet the case.

EBOLA
Just a few months ago, the country seemed convinced that Ebola was going to destroy us. While it was never going to come to that, the Administration was nonetheless criticized for not doing enough. Well it turns out, the Administration accomplished a lot: This Is How Much the U.S. Has Accomplished in Ebola Preparedness in Only Two Months. With things under control here America has stopped paying attention, but Ebola is still ravaging Sierra Leone.

Drugs
For those who doubted the worth of the Open Payments database: ”An analysis of the new federal Open Payments database shows that five of the 20 physicians who received the most money from Insys recently faced legal or disciplinary action, including three who were said to have inappropriately prescribed painkillers.”  (Using Doctors With Troubled Pasts to Market a Painkiller)

Meanwhile, bad behavior by drug companies continues as Naloxone, a Drug to Stop Heroin Deaths, Is More Costly, the Police Say. Just as the laws are changing to allow first responds to carry this life saving drug, costs are rising dramatically.

And finally, since we haven’t discussed Sovaldi in a few weeks, here is a review of the topic – and what it says about our healthcare system – from our friends at Vox: This drug costs $84,000: And there’s nothing the US health-care system can do to stop it.

System Transformation
Medical errors kill thousands of people every year. While there is still a long way to go, it is exciting news that the number of errors is dropping. This is due in part due to changes brought about by the ACA, over a three year period 50,000 lives were saved: Obama's plan to reduce hospital errors is working — and it's saved 50,000 lives.

That said, if you are looking for something to worry about, this news out of India is frightening: ‘Superbugs’ Kill India’s Babies and Pose an Overseas Threat “Indeed, researchers have already found “superbugs” carrying a genetic code first identified in India — NDM1 (or New Delhi metallo-beta lactamase 1) — around the world, including in France, Japan, Oman and the United States.” In the world today, no health problem can be restricted by boarders – we’re all in this together.

Moving back to some good news, while a bit technical, this has the potential to make a huge difference in the utility of electronic health records: EHR vendors, tech-savvy providers unite around Internet-like interoperability  “The hook could enable both the EHR and the mobile app to not only read data from each other, such as lab values or care plans, but also write data back to each other, in formats that each system could display and compute.”

I wasn't sure if I should put this here or under the drug section, but a great story about Prescribing Vegetables, Not Pills. Another piece to the idea that you need to take an individual’s situation into account when figuring out how to treat them.

And finally, for my data-geek friends out there a new resource. “The Peterson–Kaiser Health System Tracker provides comprehensive data on how the system is performing on critical quality and cost measures, offering clear, up-to-date information on relevant trends, drivers and issues. The Tracker also will illustrate how the United States is performing relative to other countries, and how different parts of the system are performing relative to one another. Regular in-depth insight briefs will delve into major issues” Have fun: Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker


All comments and suggestions are welcome; please let me know what you think. And as always, thanks for reading!

Funded by support from the Maine Health Access Foundation

*The title is a tribute to the BBC show, the NBC show and the amazing Tom Lehrer album "That Was The Year That Was"