Friday, November 21, 2014

That Was The Week That Was - Issue 37

A look back at the week's health policy news with a focus on ACA implementation

What a week: Between Gruber, subsidy case angst and yesterday’s enrollment number revelation, you might think that this is the worst stretch of ACA news since the botched launch of healthcare.gov last year. However, to think that would ignore the fact that the law continues to immeasurably improve the lives of tens of millions of people.

With that in mind, this week we’ll take a look at all of the above, check in on open-enrollment and more. (Note that I've tweaked the section heads again, hopefully these will allow you to better jump to the areas you’re interested in.) Here we go…

ACA: Opposition
As open enrollment starts, several thoughtful pieces this week on why if it’s working, opposition hasn't softened. First up, this post showing the possibility that communication failures are not the only reason for the ACA's unpopularity (spoiler alert – income redistribution might have something to do with it): The ACA is working. So why is the opposition to it so strong and persistent? And this one saying the conflict won’t stop any time soon: Here's Why Conservatives Will Never Give Up Their War on Obamacare. And finally, this one putting to light the absurdity of some of the criticisms: Can someone explain this to me? (You have to read this to believe it, and you still won’t believe it.)

For opponents of the law, Gruber is the gift that keeps on giving. Here is a man who apparently is a very smart economist but who has no filter when it comes to speaking in public. Here is an excellent summary of the “controversy”: What Jon Gruber said was dumb, but the Gruber controversy is much dumber. Here is a piece by a reporter who worked with him closely, providing some context: What Jon Gruber's Quotes Really Tell Us About Obamacare—and American Politics.

Here is a thoughtful piece reminding critics that they should be careful what they wish for – and stop objecting when they get it. Markets are messy, remember that plans changing and people needing to shop around the second year plans are available is simply the market working as it’s supposed to: People who wanted market-driven health care now have it in the Affordable Care Act.

And finally, while Uber had its own share of problems this week, the CEO of Uber Just Stuck a Knife in the Republican Party’s Heart “Kalanick told reporters that Obamacare had been a crucial element in his firm’s success. “It’s huge," he said, according to BuzzFeed. “The democratization of those types of benefits allow people to have more flexible ways to make a living. They don’t have to be working for The Man.””  So maybe the law is in fact the opposite of the “job killer” some said it would be.

ACA: Polls
This month’s Kaiser tracking poll is out and A Quarter Of Uninsured Say They Can’t Afford To Buy Coverage. “About half of uninsured expect to find coverage in the coming months, though another quarter say they won't because they do not believe they can find an affordable plan.” Here is the direct link to the full results: Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: November 2014.

Two polls out from Gallup this week. First, continuing the decline of recent years Majority Say Not Gov't Duty to Provide Healthcare for All. The percent who thought it is government’s responsibility peaked in 2006 at 69%. Interestingly, this year the group with the lowest agreement was the oldest age group – only 39% of 55+ agree. I guess Medicare doesn’t count.

In the second poll, In U.S., Ratings of Healthcare Coverage Generally Steady “Americans' ratings of healthcare coverage in the U.S. have generally held steady, despite the opening of the healthcare exchanges in 2013 and the decline in the uninsured rate this year. Thirty-eight percent of Americans now rate healthcare coverage in the U.S. as "excellent" or "good," within the range of the combined”.

ACA: Court Cases
First, remember the House lawsuit of the president over delaying the employer mandate?  After two lawyers dropped the case, The House GOP finally found a lawyer to sue Obama. Then on Friday, the suit was filed: House Republicans Sue Obama Administration Over Health Law. The suit as filed not only questions the mandate delay, but in a bit of a surprise, it also questions the payment to insurance companies for the out-of-pocket costs subsidies. At the time I’m writing this it is unclear if the issue is the difference between the full out-of-pocket subsidy and the sequester cuts – which have not been implemented to the cost sharing subsidies – or the full subsidies. Here is a post from earlier in the year looking at the sequester issue: Does the sequester apply to cost-sharing subsidies?

Next, in the aftermath of Hobby Lobby, another Birth Control Challenge Rejected as “The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a claim that the accommodation imposes a substantial burden on the groups’ expression of religion.” Or in other words, the governments accommodation is appropriate.

And finally, the week wouldn't be complete without an update on the subsidy case.  First, from last week a reminder that “There is simply no way to describe what the court did last Friday as a neutral act.” (Law in the Raw ). From Drew Altman some numbers: How 13 Million Americans Could Lose Insurance Subsidies and a review of the impact of a negative decision on subsidies: How The Supreme Court Can Kill Obamacare Without Overturning It. And finally, for those who can’t get enough Meet Michael Cannon, the man who could bring down Obamacare.

ACA: Enrollment Numbers
As you all know, I support the ACA. But that does not mean I support bad behavior. It was revealed yesterday that when HHS gave out enrollment numbers, they were including stand-alone dental plans. While we all acknowledge the importance of oral health, no one wanted those numbers mixed together. The story was first reported by Bloomberg: Obamacare Sign-Ups Were Inflated With Dental Plans. The administration quickly acknowledged the problem and said it was a mistake. I am inclined to believe them for the simple reason that if you were going to inflate the numbers, you would do so by more than 4-5%. Remember, while the consumer facing portions of healthcare.gov are working well (for the most part), there is still a lot of back-end work to be completed: Health Enrollment Counting Error Shows Where System Is Still Broken. Here in Maine, Jackie Farwell asked the question Are Maine’s Obamacare enrollment totals inflated too?  There was some entertainment as the issue led to this extraordinary headline: The Affordable Care Act's Embarrassing Moment of Tooth.

ACA: Marketplaces
Amidst all the above issues, open enrollment began last Saturday (11/15). What a difference a year makes for the ACA. For the most part, things got off to a good start as Some Hiccups, but Federal Health Exchange Website Is in Good Health. On Sunday morning, Secretary Burwell announced that there were 100K new O-Care applications on first day.

That said, things were not perfect as Immigrants Baffled By Healthcare.Gov Lapse (they could not easily upload their green card information to show proof of eligibility).

Since some people think everything is better with cats, to prepare for open enrollment, here are 9 Things You Need to Know About Obamacare and Your Health Insurance, Gif-splained By Cats (personally I think they should have used dogs).

Here in Maine, there was a kick-off event in Portland as Maine Obamacare advocates trumpet health insurance options. The event took place at Becky’s Diner where the Owner of Becky’s Diner hopes to serve up health insurance for employees. Dan Corcoran, President of Anthem Maine wrote that Affordable Care Act offers options aplenty under your fingertips.

ACA: Employers
While we mostly talk about open enrollment on the Marketplaces, for many who get coverage at work, this is also the time of year when they select their coverage for the year. Kaiser warns that with Big Changes For 2015 Workplace Plans: Watch Out For These Six Possible Pitfalls.

Despite opponents’ talking points, Few employers dropping health benefits,  “A year after the advent of new insurance marketplaces for individuals and small businesses under the health-care law, just 1 percent of employers said they have decided to stop offering health coverage for 2015, one survey said.”  Although as expected, Employers Watching Insurance Costs Closely.

ACA: Other
With the President’s address last night, it is important to note that Obama’s order won’t extend Obamacare to undocumented immigrants  Although that’s the case, some who will now be able to work legally may be eligible for benefits at work (Undocumented immigrants won't get Obamacare - but Latino coverage could rise).

In an interesting turn, the NY Times highlighted that Health Law Turns Obama and Insurers Into Allies. This is similar to my own experiences over the past year where I have found a new communality of interest between insurance companies and the public.

That said, while some interests coincide not all do – case in point California regulator knocks Anthem, Blue Shield on Obamacare networks “More than 25% of physicians listed by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of California were not taking Covered California patients or they were no longer at the location listed by the companies, according to state reports released Tuesday.”


Costs/Premiums
With the start of open enrollment, a focus on premium changes in year two: How Much Did Health Insurance Rates Go Up? It’s Complicated  and Kaiser took a look at some of the details: Change in Benchmark Silver Premiums, 2014 – 2015.

In addition to the network adequacy questions asked in the section above, a Former HHS Official Calls For ‘Smarter’ Networks That Deliver Cost-Effective Care. Transparency on the standards for how the networks are built would be an important step.

A reminder that payment reform still has a long way to go as An Obamacare program helped poor kids and saved money. It was also doomed to fail. The issue here is despite all the talk, we still live in a predominantly fee-for-service world.


EBOLA
While pushed out of the headlines, here is Why It's Too Early To Forget About Ebola. Although out of site, it’s not out of mind as Americans are more worried about Ebola than actual leading causes of death. In case you’re interested, here are the things we should really be afraid of: What kills us, in one chart.

And finally, a request from Kaci Hickox: Stop calling me 'the Ebola nurse'

Medicaid

Nationally, new numbers released this week show that Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Grows by over 9.1 Million People. Hand-in-hand with the enrollment increase, U.S. states get more, spend more on Medicaid under Obamacare.

Regarding states that have not yet expanded, some developments: Alaska's Medicaid future uncertain despite pro-expansion governor and in what would be a huge shift Hospitals seek a Texas Way to expand Medicaid (although I’m not holding my breath).

Medicare
A new Commonwealth fund survey looking across 11 countries found American Seniors Face Health Care Gaps, Despite Medicare “Americans older than 65 are more likely to have chronic illnesses and to say they struggle to afford health care – despite qualifying for the federal Medicare program – than are seniors in other industrialized countries” (Primary Source: 11-Nation Survey: Older Adults in U.S. Sickest, Most Likely to Have Problems Paying for Care)

The ACA included provisions for testing new ways of delivering care for dual eligible (those receiving both Medicare and Medicaid). But change is hard as California’s Managed Care Project For Poor Seniors Faces Backlash.

“A GAO review of health cost and quality transparency tools available from CMS found the tools lacking in relevant and understandable information and recommends steps for improvement. GAO identified characteristics of effective tools, including the need for information on specific procedures that allow consumers to compare providers based on performance.” (Health care transparency: Actions needed to improve cost and quality information for consumes)

Drugs
A “report” from the pharmaceutical industry this week raised questions: $2.6 Billion to Develop a Drug? New Estimate Makes Questionable Assumptions.

Even if that figure were true (and I don’t think it is) it would not apply to generic drugs (which have already been developed). Yet over the last year some generic prices have soared: Soaring generic drug prices draw Senate scrutiny “Some low-cost generic drugs that have helped restrain health care costs for decades are seeing unexpected price spikes of up to 8,000 percent, prompting a backlash from patients, pharmacists and now Washington lawmakers. A Senate panel met Thursday to scrutinize the recent, unexpected trend among generic medicines, which usually cost 30 to 80 percent less than their branded counterparts.”

A look from Kaiser at how providers are dealing with the issue: Hospitals And Pharmacies Grapple With Rising Drug Prices.


And on the positive side, this week a Study Finds Alternative to Anti-Cholesterol Drug “For the first time since statins have been regularly used, a large study has found that another type of cholesterol-lowering drug can protect people from heart attacks and strokes.”

System Transformation
It is taken as gospel by some that we don’t have enough doctors in this country, but is that true?  NPR took a look: Doctor Shortage Looming? Maybe Not

There is no doubt we do have an organ shortage, the question arises, is there a better solution than convincing more people to donate: An organ shortage is killing people. Are lab-grown organs the answer?  While we’re not ready to “print” a whole new organ (yet), it is astounding what we can print: PRINT THYSELF: How 3-D printing is revolutionizing medicine.
Everyone agrees on the need for quality measures, but the devil is in the details. What are they, who determines them, how many different sets are needed?  Amidst all the ongoing controversies, it is refreshing to see validation of at least one set of measures: The Inverse Relationship Between Mortality Rates And Performance In The Hospital Quality Alliance Measures.

As we strive for better quality care, should we as patients be required to tell our providers how to behave?  One answer: Patients should not have to advocate for their own safety  “It’s a bad turn of events when health care quality programs need to work around physicians by asking patients to engage in dialog with their health care providers to avoid dirty hands and unnecessary care.”

But we do bear individual responsibility in some areas (like vaccination). The ramifications of some decisions is disturbing as There were more measles cases in 2014 than any year during the last two decades.

Finally, I haven’t made you cry for a while – OK, maybe I have with continued reports of the threats to the ACA and people’s health coverage – but not in the good way. So here you go: What does a good death mean to you?



All comments and suggestions are welcome; please let me know what you think. And as always, thanks for reading!

Funded by support from the Maine Health Access Foundation

*The title is a tribute to the BBC show, the NBC show and the amazing Tom Lehrer album "That Was The Year That Was"